Tribunal rejects reliance on adviser as reasonable excuse
A recent First-tier Tribunal decision has confirmed that relying on an accountant does not automatically amount to a reasonable excuse for missing a self-assessment deadline. The case highlights the limits of delegating tax responsibilities. What does this mean in practice?
In the case, the taxpayer argued that their failure to file on time was due to reliance on their adviser, who had been responsible for handling their tax affairs. HMRC rejected this explanation and issued late filing penalties. The tribunal agreed with HMRC. It found that while taxpayers may appoint an agent, responsibility for meeting filing deadlines ultimately remains with the taxpayer. Simply assuming that an adviser will deal with matters is not sufficient to establish a reasonable excuse.
The decision reflects a consistent line in tribunal cases that reliance on a third party will only amount to a reasonable excuse in limited circumstances, such as where the taxpayer has taken reasonable steps to ensure compliance and an unexpected failure occurs. The practical message is clear. Even where an accountant is engaged, you should ensure deadlines are understood and met. Regular communication with advisers and monitoring of filing obligations can help prevent avoidable penalties.
Related Topics
-
Why is HMRC checking PVA more often?
Your business imports goods and accounts for VAT by applying postponed VAT accounting (PVA) on its returns. HMRC is scrutinising returns and issuing large assessments in some cases. What can you do to reduce the risk of getting it wrong?
-
HMRC text or scam? Check before you act
HMRC is contacting some taxpayers by text this week about overdue Self Assessment liabilities and is also sending updates about VAT registration applications. At the same time, it has expanded its guidance on spotting fake HMRC messages on social media. How can you tell whether a message is genuine?
-
Electronic VAT return and payment due