Taxpayer loses child benefit charge row in unusual circumstances
The First Tier Tribunal has dismissed an appeal involving a divorced taxpayer who left the family home but continued to be liable for the high-income child benefit charge, but with some unusual circumstances. What happened?
Mr Meades (M) and his first wife had a child in 2012, but separated in July 2017 and divorced on 4 April 2019. During the 2019/20 tax year, M married his second wife, whom he lived with for the entire tax year. The divorced couple had received child benefit throughout - the amount being paid into M's first wife's account. HMRC assessed additional tax of £1,076 for Mr M in 2019/20, on the basis that the high income child benefit charge was due for the year. He appealed on the basis that he and his first wife were not partners per the legislation.
Unfortunately for M, he had made the original application in his name. Even though he had never received any of it and the child mainly lived with his ex-wife, the claim was still in his name. The appeal was dismissed.
The better thing to do would have been for M's ex-wife to take over the claim. She could then continue to receive the payments with no charge on M.
Related Topics
-
CT61
-
Government finally confirms date for capital goods scheme reforms
The government has finally confirmed when long-awaited changes to the capital goods scheme (CGS) will take effect. The reforms, first announced as part of a wider review of VAT simplification, will come into force on 29 July 2026. What does this mean for businesses?
-
The tax‑free perks league table
You know that there are certain items or services your company can pay for without incurring a tax charge, but you’re hazy on the details. What are the most valuable tax-free perks for owner managers and which ones are you missing out on?