Taxpayer loses child benefit charge row in unusual circumstances
The First Tier Tribunal has dismissed an appeal involving a divorced taxpayer who left the family home but continued to be liable for the high-income child benefit charge, but with some unusual circumstances. What happened?
Mr Meades (M) and his first wife had a child in 2012, but separated in July 2017 and divorced on 4 April 2019. During the 2019/20 tax year, M married his second wife, whom he lived with for the entire tax year. The divorced couple had received child benefit throughout - the amount being paid into M's first wife's account. HMRC assessed additional tax of £1,076 for Mr M in 2019/20, on the basis that the high income child benefit charge was due for the year. He appealed on the basis that he and his first wife were not partners per the legislation.
Unfortunately for M, he had made the original application in his name. Even though he had never received any of it and the child mainly lived with his ex-wife, the claim was still in his name. The appeal was dismissed.
The better thing to do would have been for M's ex-wife to take over the claim. She could then continue to receive the payments with no charge on M.
Related Topics
-
Electronic VAT return and payment due
-
HMRC checks directors’ loans are paid up
HMRC is writing to agents to check corporation tax returns for previous years are correct as it used to be possible to add a future date for an anticipated loan repayment. What’s the issue and what should you do if your advisor receives a letter?
-
Working from home tax relief scrapped in Budget
Employees who are required to work from home are currently able to claim tax relief at a flat rate of £6 per week. That's changing from 6 April 2026. What's the full story?